This is the kind of forward-thinking proposal SafeDAO needs. Tackling both protocol centralization risk and token utility in one move is a power play. The idea of turning the transaction service into a decentralized, opt-in privacy layer is especially strong — it upgrades user security without friction, and actually gives the SAFE token economic purpose beyond governance.
Institutional-grade privacy for the average user? Yes, please.
Revenue flowing back to SAFE stakers? That’s real utility.
Eliminating single points of failure? Core to decentralization.
That said, I’d love to hear more on how relayer incentives will be tuned over time, especially in early phases before wide adoption kicks in. But overall, this is a solid step toward making SAFE more than just a governance token. Count me in on supporting and amplifying this and open to co-authoring too if there’s space!