a little late to the party but i would like to share my opinion regardless. it’s clear that the intentions of these token use cases are to create native defi apps and reestablish safe identity as a the defi protocol. i do not believe that safe should to be a defi protocol and my comments below reflect that.
Use Cases
no. 1 & 2 i feel that staking is so widely available on the blockchain that safe does not need to integrate a native staking contract. the only advantage that i can see is allowing more control over safe points apr. although, like how morpho was handled, the same can be done but more streamlined for future protocols. the advance app marketplace is a better way to streamline staking in the safe UI.
no. 3 is good and can get partners to give out prizes/airdrops based on tier.
no. 4 LP is good, solidifying liquidity is important.
no. 5 seems like a proposal to start curating the second marketplace for advanced users. no problem with that but i fail to understand the vision behind this. it’s important that attracting users to the marketplace is streamlined and profitable.
no. 6 a good proposal but i disagree with tokenizing fees. a credit system makes sense but creating a token from it adds unnecessary layers. see article for reference on a credit system that could be utilized. https://learn.utility.credit/ alternatively, the safe points system could integrate fee credits for users, builders and protocols respectively.