Hi Safe community ![]()
I’m exploring an idea and would really appreciate feedback from builders and users who actively use Safe wallets.
The idea
A professional Guardian-as-a-Service for Safe wallets using Social Recovery.
The core concept is simple:
-
Users keep full self-custody of their assets.
-
I do NOT hold funds.
-
I do NOT have unilateral control.
-
I act as one of multiple guardians in a social recovery setup.
-
I only participate in the recovery process (never in normal transactions).
-
I can never be the sole guardian (off-chain rule + required threshold).
The goal is to provide a reliable, professional, and neutral guardian for users who:
-
Don’t want to rely only on friends/family
-
Don’t fully trust centralized custody
-
Want redundancy beyond personal devices
-
Are managing meaningful amounts of capital
Proposed Features (MVP)
-
Guardian for Safe Social Recovery (n-of-m threshold only) -
Never the sole signer -
Manual recovery verification process (off-chain identity confirmation before signing) -
Time-lock period respected before owner change is finalized -
Clear Terms of Service and transparency about role and limitations -
Activity logging
Questions for the community
-
Does this solve a real problem in your opinion?
-
Would you consider adding a professional third-party guardian?
-
What would make such a service trustworthy enough for you?
-
What are the biggest risks you see?
-
Does something like this already exist in the Safe ecosystem that I may be missing?
Thanks in advance ![]()