I was reading the SafeDAO treasury-management discussion around SEP 24, and it is a strong example of the kind of governance and treasury action that benefits from a second technical pass before execution: joint treasury structure changes, signer and module assumptions, fee and mandate design, and ongoing execution responsibilities.
I offer a narrow Proposal Review Service for treasury and governance actions that touch execution paths, signer permissions, treasury control, or service-provider mandates. Before approval or execution, I review what the action does, which addresses, assets, and permissions it affects, and whether the execution path is consistent with the intended outcome.
The output is a concise written report with decoded actions, flagged risks, open questions, and a practical readiness recommendation.
This is not a full audit. It is a concise execution-focused review for teams that want clearer operational confidence before funds move or control surfaces change.
If useful, I can start with one proposal or treasury-action review.